Navigating Disclosure and Standardisation: Policy Amidst Turbulence in Sustainable Finance Market
ING Economics 10.08.2023 08:35
Policy is still pointing at greater disclosure transparency and standardisation despite turbulence
As mentioned above, transparent and standardised sustainability reporting is essential in assuring the credibility of an issuer’s ESG products, helping to boost investor confidence, and to drive the healthy growth of the global sustainable finance market. Policies and initiatives need to play a role here, and we are seeing more efforts ramped up in this area.
In late June, the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) launched its sustainability and climate disclosure standards. The ISSB signals an important convergence of different reporting standards and frameworks such as the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), offering companies an overarching framework. Already having support from G7 and G20 countries, the ISSB is expecting wide adoption over time.
The EU has a relatively more unified ESG policy environment, where disclosure requirements (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, or CSRD), the sustainable activity classification system (Taxonomy) and the Green Bond Standard reinforce each other. Admittedly, complying with all the regulatory requirements can meet difficulties around necessary data and interpretation. And many of the bloc’s policies are still evolving, with the newly adopted European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) introducing more flexibility around ESG materiality and Scope 3 emissions disclosure. Still, the EU’s more established and complex ESG system can support smoother growth in sustainable finance issuance.
In the US, although more than 30 states have passed or proposed anti-ESG investment bills, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is slowly advancing in mandating climate-related disclosure and aims to release the final proposed rules this October. The final rules will likely allow more flexibility – for instance, Scope 3 emissions data may no longer be required. Even if less strict relative to original plans, these rules will be revolutionary for the US market, facilitating a large step closer to European and other peers.
In Asia, several economies already have their own guidelines and taxonomies, such as Japan’s green, social, and climate transition finance guidelines, China’s Green Bond Principles, South Korea’s Korea Green Taxonomy, etc. Yet Asia is more of a follower rather than a trend setter, and several jurisdictions have adopted the EU’s system, or the widely accepted international frameworks. The ISSB is likely to have a considerable impact on APAC – Singapore, for instance, has already proposed ISSB-aligned disclosure from listed companies starting in 2025. Nevertheless, we would expect more lenient local specifications in policy setting. For example, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN’s) taxonomy considers certain types of coal phase-out activities to be aligned.
What does this mean for investors and issuers?
Quality issuance is the best strategy against uncertainty. As the sustainable finance market moves from the initial period of rapid growth to a maturing phase with more ESG disclosure mandates and scrutiny, it has become important for issuers to navigate through greenwashing risks by actively leveling up their sustainability credibility. Investors have started to and will increasingly favor quality issuers with ambitious long-term ESG targets, clear interim targets, rigorous progress reporting, as well as detailed disclosure of capital allocation from their sustainable finance products.
Environmental, Social, and Governance aspects will all progress, but the urgency to reduce emissions and mitigate climate risks will remain a strong source of demand for sustainable financing. This can help promote innovation and facilitate the commercialization of nascent decarbonization technologies.
We are in an era of adjustment and normalisation, but sustainable finance remains a crucial tool to provide financial support for sustainable activities. Therefore, we do see the market continuing to grow in the future.